![]() The midrange and bottom end is round, clear, and tight. The top end gives air and pristine clarity WITHOUT EVER becoming harsh or sterile. I recently upgraded to the Apogee Element Series, and I can honestly say the DIFFERENCE IS INCREDIBLE! The sound out of the element 88 is round with tons of depth. I owned 2 of them for several years and admired them and their sound quality. “ I’ve been in love with Apogee products ever since I was introduced to the Apogee Duet2. That said, there are more options to control Element 88 than we’ve ever offered before: By omitting hardware controls, we’re able to offer higher quality audio circuitry at a price per channel that’s unmatched in today’s audio interface market. So, how is it that we can offer superior conversion and mic preamps while maintaining affordability? We’ve made Element’s chassis extremely robust and, as you may have noticed, rather minimalist. Element 88’s analog outputs offer exactly what you need – 2 XLR and 2 TRS line outputs that can be configured to switch between 2 speaker sets or independent stereo outputs, plus 2 high power headphone outputs with completely independent routing. Thanks to Element’s Thunderbolt connectivity and Apogee’s custom driver, you’ll experience vanishingly low latency while maintaining a low CPU load, so more of your Mac’s processing power is available to your DAW. Element 88 continues this tradition of excellence, offering the best A to D and D to A conversion performance in its class. The next stage of your signal path is the analog to digital conversion, a technology for which Apogee has led the field for over 35 years. I think it is slightly out of your suggested budget but if bypassing the preamps is a big thing for you it might be worth a look.2 Combi mic/line/instrument inputs with mic preamps and selectable 48v phantom powerĤ Combi mic/line/instrument inputs with mic preamps and selectable 48v phantom powerĤ XLR IN with mic preamps and selectable 48v phantom powerġ independent 1/4″ stereo headphone outputĢ independent 1/4″ stereo headphone outputĪnalog inputs 1 to 4 also include quarter-inch instrument inputs with a high impedance bridging circuit, so keyboards, guitars and other instruments maintain a bright and present sound. I think it is one of only a few that can do that in its price range. I just thought I would say that if you are after some line inputs that don't go through any further preamp circuitry then you could check out our iD22 interface, which has the same Class A preamps as iD14 but with inserts which allow you to bypass the preamps. ID14 should be fine either using the DI or line inputs (through the preamp) for your channel strip, although I understand if you are not wanting to put it through another preamp circuit. If you have any questions about using it in your setup then feel free to ask a question here or give us an email at. I am glad that you are considering iD14 for your needs. I guess flexibility is a large down side to having a tight budget.Hi Audionaut, I'd have to either plug my tube channel strip balanced out into their DI input (J-Fet) or the "mic pre" inputs (Op amps). It's a shame there's no balanced line-in available that doesn't throw another amp circuit into the chain. Thanks, I wasn't even aware of the Audient iD14, but it looks very promising. The front runner that I've been considering is a new or used Focusrite Saffire Pro 24 DSP with a Thunderbolt to Firewire adapter.ĪNY advice would be appreciated. not sure I need more than that.ĥ) no more than $300 all in (cables, converters, etc).ġ) decent monitoring options (multiple headphone & monitor outputs)ģ) Lightpipe I/O, ADAT- possibly for actual ADAT transfers More I/Os or pre's are nice, but I do NOT anticipate having to record multiple musicians or more than 2 inputs at a time.ģ) SPDIF I/O I have a bunch of old mix DATs that I hope to transfer before they're just dust.Ĥ) 24bit/96k. ![]() ![]() Don't care about new or used as long as it works.ġ) At least 2 channels of mic preamps for connecting external keyboards/sound modules. I have a couple decent condenser mics and a pre-amp/channel strip. ![]() I'm having difficulty picking the right low cost solution as well as being on the fence between using my MacBook Air's USB 2.0 port or Thunderbolt port (possibly with Firewire adapters). I want to start tracking some acoustic guitar and vocals soon and realize that I'll will likely need another audio interface to do this right. Currently I'm only doing drum editing and tracking guitars and bass through my Yamaha THR10 amp's USB I/O connection. I've got a little songwriting DAW setup with a Macbook Air (mid 2013) running Logic Pro X. I'm on a budget with this setup, so please be kind! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |